Telecom operators and customer experience

Photo credit: Pixabay

Many telecoms operators are placing customer experience at the heart of their strategies, and are seeking to differentiate themselves from competitors by better meeting the needs of their customer base. customer experience and telecoms

Analysys Mason did research across 21 countries to highlight how different factors are perceived by customers.

[bs-quote quote=”In many cases, a focus on customer experience is also helping to reduce costs” style=”default” align=”left”][/bs-quote]

The standard industry metric for measuring customer satisfaction is the Net Promoter Score (NPS). It is widely used by telecoms operators (and players in other sectors) to assess their performance against their peers on an ongoing basis. Customers are asked how willing they are to promote their service provider on a scale from 0 to 10 (where 0 is not at all willing, and 10 is very willing). The percentage of detractors (scoring 0 to 6) is subtracted from the percentage of promoters (scoring 9 or 10) to give an NPS between –100 and +100. The scores for telecoms operators vary widely. The highest score among the major mobile operators included in our 2017 survey was +29 for Free (France).

Some aspects of mobile services have a greater impact on individuals’ willingness to promote (and, therefore, NPS) than others. The results show the main factors that make a difference to NPS in various countries.

Customer experience and telecoms

The results highlight many differences between countries and regions. The specific roles played by the various service elements are as follows.

  • Network coverage. The single largest determinant of customer satisfaction across the whole sample was network coverage. This was most notable in the less-developed markets, particularly in the emerging Asia–Pacific countries. Improving coverage satisfaction leads to a greater improvement in NPS than other factors. Indosat in Indonesia is an example of where an operator’s NPS was pulled down by customers’ poor perception of its network.
  • Data speed. In Europe and the USA, satisfaction with data speed and network coverage showed collinearity: they accounted for the same contribution to willingness to promote. In other words, in these countries, customers seem to have a more unified perception of network performance. In less-developed markets, there was more divergence. Some smaller operators with focused build-outs in urban areas were often able to score well on satisfaction due to their ability to meet the needs of their customers with focused investments in capacity. An example of this is 9mobile, which has the highest NPS in Nigeria.
  • Customer services. Satisfaction with customer services shows more divergence than for most other factors, with more polarised results; a relatively high proportion of respondents stated that they were “very dissatisfied” with customer services. The level of satisfaction with this element is often a very strong predictor of willingness to promote (and also propensity to churn), particularly in the developed markets of Europe and the USA. We have been able to identify several operators that appear to have challenges with their customer service operations. We have also identified (generally positive) effects from the digitalisation of customer service functions.
  • Pricing. We found that pricing was a less decisive factor in overall NPS than the factors already discussed, despite levels of satisfaction with pricing generally being low. This suggests that there are opportunities for operators to monetise improved network performance, for example, in many markets. There are, however, important exceptions. Price is still the main determinant of satisfaction in a few markets (Poland and Saudi Arabia). It also accounts for the NPS leadership of a few operators, where a strong performance on price overcomes weaknesses in other areas. Examples include Free (France), Telkom (South Africa) and Yoigo (Spain). customer experience and telecoms
  • Allowances. Satisfaction levels for data allowances sometimes showed collinearity with price satisfaction but were generally weaker predictors of customers’ willingness to promote. Higher volume allowances are generally available to customers, though there are exceptions (where operators have tiered their plans in less customer-friendly ways). Voice and SMS allowances rarely made any difference to NPS, only featuring as a factor in a few markets.

The relative importance of the drivers of customer satisfaction in different countries can act as a guide to operators’ strategies to gain advantage. The analysis of our consumer survey data points towards the potential trade-offs in investment for price competitiveness, improved network performance and addressing shortcomings in customer service, among other things. The results show what operators can do to really make a difference to their customers.


Like this? "Sharing is caring!"

You might also like
Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More